|
May 06 Newsletter
[back to the Table of Contents]
Shameless,
Toothless, Obfuscation
Saba Demian
On the 8th of May
during a session of the British House of Lords, Baroness Cox asked
Lord Triesman, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the
Foreign and Commonwealth Office, whether the British Government
intended to make representations to Egypt regarding the recent attacks
on Coptic Christians. The debate that ensued cannot be described more
aptly than by these three words ‘shameless, toothless, obfuscation.’
The Peers displayed little but mediocre concern and watered-down
answers when pressed on the plight of Egypt’s Copts. It is difficult
to believe that the Lords are not aware of both the grievous situation
of the Copts in Egypt and the superficial solutions which the Egyptian
government is undertaking to alleviate their problems.
In this debate the
Lords were reaching out their hands patting themselves on the back for
the abortive efforts they have performed, and further, extending their
hands across the Mediterranean Sea to pat the back of President
Mubarak and his government for positive ‘telling’ actions to solve
this egregious problem. Their comments were shameless.
A statement/question
was put by a noble lady, questioning why the highly trained police
force does not emerge on the scene until the damage is done. This,
surely, is knowledge which most assuredly is telling of the British
governments’ obfuscation. They know what is happening. Despite the
meeting of a British Diplomat with Egyptian authorities on April 22
urging investigation of the massacre in Alexandria, the British
government has been conspicuous in its inaction.
Lord Triesman
responded to Baroness Cox’s criticism of Britain’s inaction by saying
that there was evidence that the Egyptian government was making “a big
effort” to bring the perpetrators to justice. “For my part, I do not
accept that it is wholly convincing that the most recent attacks were
the acts of ‘one psychologically deranged individual,’” he continued.
He made no attempt to criticize the Egyptian state on the governments’
behalf, aside from implicating that he personally did not believe
their account of the violence.
If this
is the extent of the efforts the Copts can look forward to from the
West to ease their burden, then God help them. When asked by the
British ambassador whether the Copts wished the protection of her
Majesty’s government in the late nineteenth century, the Patriarch of
the See of Alexandria his responded by asking his Excellency “and who
is protecting her Majesty’s government?”
|